|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Miscellany (pdf)
Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden by
Gary Ades, Roger Kendrick, Amanda Haig, Tan Kit Sun, General wildlife sightings were posted on the KFBG Wildlife Sightings Board on a fortnightly basis up to mid-April 2006, with records provided by staff and visitors. Many records were generated by the Security team on night shifts. From the middle of April, a new board was introduced at the New Reception, which is updated more frequently with regularly seen wildlife; more unusual sightings are now posted on the KFBG website (www.kfbg.org). (1) The following sighting records from Kwun Yum Shan (KYS) and elsewhere in KFBG (see map in Porcupine! 33 for locations) were posted between October 2005 and May 2006:
In addition to the general sightings, Peter Paul van Dijk, Director of the Conservation International CABS Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Conservation Program, visited KFBG in early March and made a couple of forays onto the hillside, noting the following:
(2) Fauna Conservation Department Project News: The monthly moth survey [Roger Kendrick] Light trap recording has taken place on seven evenings or nights between late October 2005 and mid May 2006. At least 440 species were recorded, not including data for the last two sessions awaiting analysis At least one macro moth species was recorded in Hong Kong for the first time: Thinopteryx crocoptera [Geometridae], in the Butterfly Garden on 26 November 2005. In addition, several older records have been verified, resulting in two new species to Hong Kong – Scopula pulchellata [Geometridae] from the Butterfly Garden on 24 April 2003 and Marapana pulverata [Noctuidae] also from the Butterfly Garden on 12 May 2001. Wild Animal Rescue Centre (WARC) [Amanda Haig, Tan Kit Sun] The number of birds admitted to the centre over the winter period was less than 1/3 of the usual intake. It is suspected that this may be due to the current Avian Influenza situation where birds are being routed directly to HK Govt animal holding facilities. The construction of a long-awaited flight (Fig. 4) test cage was completed in late March. Its design, uniquely conceived by Fauna Conservation staff, comprises four recycled China Light Power wooden telephone poles, a cable-suspended soft netting structure and sand covered floor. The design prevents occupants from damaging themselves during flight-testing and can easily be taken down during times of inclement weather to prevent damage.
As reported in the last edition of Porcupine!, the Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela that had suffered a hip fracture having been struck by a truck at Man Kam To made a full recovery and was released in late November 2005. Animal rehoming to range country organisations involved in captive breeding & conservation projects for those species included: 34 critically endangered Vietnamese pond turtles (Fig. 5), Mauremys annamensis, which included two adults rescued from Hong Kong markets and 32 offspring born in captivity, were returned by Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden to Vietnam on 10 May. The returnees and their offspring were transferred to the Turtle Conservation Center (TCC) at Cuc Phuong National Park where the government runs a conservation program for critically endangered species, including the Vietnamese pond turtle. "Eventually, the turtles may be released in central Vietnam where they originated", says Bui Dang Phong, manager of the TCC for Cuc Phuong National Park. Mr. Phong says he is elated to see the turtles finally make it back to Vietnam. See the website link for further information. http://www.asianturtlenetwork.org/library/ATCN_news/2006_articles/Press_release_ Endemic_Vietnamese_Pond_turtles_come_home_05_06.html One Large Malaysian Giant Turtle (Fig. 5) (Orlitia borneensis) to Taiping Zoo, Malaysia, where it joins other Orlitia in a large lake.
Below is a list of some of the animals received by the WARC that have been successfully rehabilitated and subsequently released since mid-October 2005.
(3) Other News Lepidoptera Conservation Symposium (Roger Kendrick) As reported in Porcupine! 33, KFBG will host the first South East Asian Lepidoptera Conservation Symposium between the 4 and 8 September 2006. Key speakers include leaders in their field at the regional and global level. They include:
Anyone interested in participating in the symposium should contact the Fauna Conservation Department at fauna@kfbg.org. Further information on the symposium is available on-line at http://asia.geocities.com/hkmoths/SEALCS2006/. Sham Chung –updates (Captain Wong) The Sham Chung wetland (Fig. 6) was destroyed and converted into a golf-course turf area in 1997 (Porcupine! 19). This wetland was regarded as one of the top five freshwater wetlands in Hong Kong in 1996 and it was identified as one of the 12 ecological hotspots in the New Hong Kong Nature Conservation Policy in 2004 [for related article, see p. 27]. Since its destruction in 1997, the lowland has been further trashed through mangrove cutting, unauthorized river training and further farmland destruction. However, no enforcement action has been undertaken, as most areas are designated private lands and no suspects have been observed during enforcement activities. On 3 February 2006, a Development Permission Area (DPA) plan was gazetted. This offers statutory authorization for the Planning Department to undertake enforcement and prosecution in regard to unauthorized developments on private lands. The planning intention of Sham Chung, a pocket area surrounded by Sai Kung West Country Park, is to conserve the areas of high significance and rural character, as well as to maintain the unique landscape and cultural heritage of the area. According to this plan, Sham Chung will provide housing for 570 people. In the DPA plan, Sham Chung is zoned as follows:
Drawbacks 1. Inappropriate zoning of habitats According to the findings of a KFBG site visit on 29 March 2006, the coastal wetland is zoned as "V-zone" and "Agriculture", while a lowland stream with mature riparian vegetation also falls within the boundary of "V-zone". Coastal wetland and lowland stream areas are not ideal places to build small houses. 2. The environmental "vandal" benefits Most of the previous freshwater wetland area is zoned as "Agriculture". If it had not been converted to grow turf in 1997, no one could argue against the wetland being zoned as a "Conservation Area" due to its high ecological value. Areas zoned as "Agriculture" are often considered as ‘landbanks’ for further development. 3. Sham Chung - a small town? Like similar planning forecasts in the rural NT, the projection of 570 residents at Sham Chung is unrealistic. No one is likely to build small houses at a place with no access road. Taking the case of Tai Long Wan as an example, although the Planning Department’s population projections dropped from 200 in October 2001 to 117 in 2006, the actual rural population is still less than 10! This indicates that demand for small house development in remote areas with poor access, i.e., no road, is very low, although land has already been reserved for them. So, why do we need to reserve a large area for a population of 570 residents that does not and is unlikely to ever exist? Also, how many small houses and how much infrastructure should be built for housing this expected population? Is this a good use of taxpayers’ money? Could the natural beauty, biological diversity and rural character of Sham Chung still be preserved if there are 570 residents? 4. Stream protection - buffer area It is good to note that a lowland stream is zoned as a "Conservation Area" due to the presence of rare freshwater wildlife. However, as there is no buffer area to separate the stream from the nearby "Agriculture" area, any inappropriate agricultural activity could cause a direct impact on the aquatic wildlife in the stream. Another side to the story While green groups suggest keeping Sham Chung as natural as possible, the SCMP reported on 18 April that there is plan to include a helicopter landing pad (later denied by the planner), a holiday camp, a resort-style hotel, houses, a picnic area, a private club, a Catholic church, a recreation centre and sport centres at Sham Chung. These urbanization developments are claimed to be compatible with the area's rural setting, and amazingly with the recognition of Sham Chung as one of the 12 sites under the New Nature Conservation Policy. This seems completely illogical! Recommendations Apart from zoning the lowland habitats as green zones, the "V-zone" boundary could be much reduced as re-development of old houses at the original villages in land zoned proposed as Green Belt may meet the demand, if any. It is also suggested that the Town Planning Board should encourage wetland restoration at the previous freshwater wetland area by giving a ‘green’ zoning to this disturbed area. Further Information An in-depth article on this issue has been published in the April 2006 issue of Green Country (volume 59, pp 2-9).
P.31-35 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|